Showing posts with label Movie Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie Review. Show all posts

February 11, 2011

Review: Angel(2011)


Hindi films have often depicted rare illnesses/disorders/disabilities... GHAJINI [Anterograde Amnesia], PAA [Progeria], MY NAME IS KHAN [Asperger Syndrome], TAARE ZAMEEN PAR [Dyslexia], BLACK [Alzheimer's], KARTHIK CALLING KARTHIK [Schizophrenia], GUZAARISH [Paraplegia]. Now Ganesh Acharya's ANGEL talks of Cerebral Palsy. Like his peers, Acharya isn't merely highlighting a disability. ANGEL is primarily a love story... a hatke prem kahani in filmi lingo. 


Love can happen anytime, anywhere, to anyone. It can happen to people who have arrived at the sunset of their life and also to those with serious disabilities. Though we talk about how love is the purest emotion, our society, very often, does not accept love when it doesn't fit into our perception of love. To cite an example, love between an elder person and someone half his/her age or love between members of the same sex or between disabled individuals may make us uncomfortable. We get judgmental at times, thinking that we are right, while others -- those who don't act according to what we feel is right -- are labeled as rebels, oddballs and misfits. ANGEL does that. It goes into the unconventional zone, depicting a love story between a social misfit and a woman suffering with Cerebral Palsy.


There's talk that ANGEL is similar to GUZAARISH. It's not. Nor is it similar to SADMA. In GUZAARISH, Hrithik was completely paralyzed below his neck, while Madalsa's character in ANGEL can move and crawl. The fact is ANGEL borrows heavily from a South Korean film called OASIS, directed by the acclaimed Lee Chang-dong. In fact, if you've watched OASIS [it's one of my favorites], it has the quality to stay fresh in your memory even after you've watched incalculable films subsequently. But ANGEL fails as a film to strike a chord.

The subject material is stunningly bold-n-beautiful, but the challenge lies in implementing it with conviction. Ganesh Acharya had handled the emotional moments with flourish in his directorial debut SWAMI, but he doesn't get it right this time. He had an opportunity to offer a convincing vision of what love actually means. But the writing lets him down and therefore, ANGEL doesn't come across as an intriguing human drama. The delicate love story lacks the sensitivity, feeling, compassion and understanding it deserves.

Final word? ANGEL is just not a compelling human story!

Abhay [Nilesh Sahay] flaunts society's rules, unaware of or unconcerned with the consequences of his actions. After serving his sentence for the manslaughter that he had committed, Abhay decides to meet the family members of the deceased man and apologize for his reckless act. When he arrives at the address, he finds a couple moving out of their room, handing their disabled sister, Sonal's [Madalsa] responsibility to a caretaker [Rakhi Vijan]. Sonal suffers from Cerebral Palsy, while her brother and sister-in-law cash on her disability. Abhay is attracted to Sonal and leaves behind his phone number.

Sonal calls up Abhay one night. Slowly, a friendship begins to blossom between Abhay and Sonal. One fateful night, Sonal's brother and sister-in-law catch Abhay and Sonal making love. Abhay is arrested and it's up to Sonal to try to absolve Abhay, who is accused of raping her. The world is against them...

ANGEL had the potential to move you with a compelling love story, but the writing is amateurish, while the execution of the material is equally childish. There are gaping holes in the screenplay and one wonders how it was okayed in the first place. For instance, the caretaker is never around when Nilesh visits Madalsa. Strangely, not even once do the neighbors living in this busy chawl spot Nilesh taking Madalsa out for an outing.

That's not all, the songs are like the unwanted guests here that pop up at regular intervals. From the rustic chawl, the lovers suddenly start singing songs in Switzerland and are back to the chawl in Mumbai the moment the song ends. The climax takes the cake. It is most hurried and looks like a screenplay of convenience, with Nilesh being released from prison and cleared of rape charges so easily. The music doesn't work, except for the title track. But the placement of songs is a problem. Cinematography is good. Dialogue are below the mark.

Given the poor script, there's not much the lead actors can really do. Madalsa does try hard and so does Nilesh. Both make a sincere attempt and the earnestness shows. The sole sequence which really appealed to me is when Madalsa feeds Nilesh; it's a touching moment. Aroona Irani is as usual. Manoj Joshi is loud. Kishori Shahane Vij doesn't get scope. Rakhi Vijan is passable.

On the whole, ANGEL fails to impress.


 

January 27, 2011

Review: The King's Speech (2010)


Movie: The King's Speech
Cast: Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush, Helena Bonham Carter
Rating: 4.5/5
Awards: Colin Firth (Best Actor, Golden Globes)
Colin Firth simply mesmerizes the audience with his supreme acting in the historical saga The King's Speech. The film revolves around changes in expectations from a king brought about by the invention of a radio. It is a story of a prince who is loyal to his father, George V, and his elder brother, the king's successor.
Prince Albert, played by Colin Firth, has a speech impediment causing him to stammer. In an age where radio has just been invented, royalty has an extended duty of communicating with the people, a task impossible for Albert.
He meets a therapist named Lionel played by Geoffrey Rush and is unsure of his ability to help. With the king's demise and his elder brother's refusal to take the throne under astonishing circumstances, Albert becomes the king!
The King's Speech is about the speech of a king in a time of war. It is about a stammerer's most important words that could mean the difference between the rise and fall of an empire. It is about a therapist who had no credentials but was confident that a man who couldn't talk could be a king and could deliver a reassuring speech to a country terrified by Hitler.
The acting is amazing. Colin Firth is outstanding and gives a great portrayal of a man who exerts control over everyone and everything in England barring his own tongue. Geoffrey Rush is outstanding with Lionel the actor/therapist who is adamant about making "Berty" (Prince Albert) a king who could deliver a speech.
ll in all, anything more would be a spoiler as the film is a must-see and can only be enjoyed if interpreted by an individual in his own perspective. To me it is a masterpiece and deserves glory at the Oscars!      

January 10, 2011

No One Killed Jessica Movie Rreview


Most storytellers entertain, a few enlighten. A scattering number of celluloid visionaries entertain as well as enlighten. Rajkumar Gupta fits into that exceptional variety of film-makers that opens up thought-processes about the condition of the homeland without losing the cinematic elements that constitute a film.


To reconstruct on celluloid a true occurrence that is oven fresh in public reminiscence is not a trouble-free mission, but Gupta takes up this colossal challenge of placing together the controversial and litigious story of Jessica Lall's murder case on celluloid. However, having sensitive and explosive material on hand is not enough. The execution of the subject is of paramount importance. Fortunately, the one-film-old director interprets the events of the murder case in remarkable style and form and makes it a cinematic experience that haunts you even after the film has concluded. Gupta does complete justice to the spirit of the story, which had created headlines and still remains well etched in our memory to this day.


A few monsoons ago, Rajkumar Santoshi's HALLA BOL commenced with a shootout sequence at a party. Of course, HALLA BOL wasn't about this incident alone, it was just a tiny segment in the narrative. NO ONE KILLED JESSICA focuses on this true-life incident [with no deviations] and its strength lies in the fact that it sucks you into the world of dirty politics and power games as soon as it unfolds. 


NO ONE KILLED JESSICA is not Gupta's first and foremost endeavor at illustrating a real incident that shook the nation. Even in his directorial debut AAMIR, Gupta depicted a common man's [Rajeev Khandelwal] hard try at combating terrorism and violence. However, that was a work of fiction. But NO ONE KILLED JESSICA is a different ballgame altogether because reams of paper and hours of television footage have been devoted to this case. Thankfully, Gupta makes it an engaging thriller rather than relying on the docu-drama format. 


On the whole, NO ONE KILLED JESSICA is a poignant story of two women's resolve for justice. It's a remarkable blend of facts and fiction inspired by a series of real-life episodes, which has thankfully not been presented as a tedious biography or in a mind-numbing docu-drama format. It's more of an engaging thriller which has the right doses of histrionics, tautness, anguish and thrills. The emotional and disturbing journey, the strength of the common man and the relentless endeavor of the media have all been most compellingly put together on moving picture. In times of yore, a lot of films have been attempted on real-life incidents, but haven't struck a chord so effectively. NO ONE KILLED JESSICA should shatter this jinx. This heroic and daring film truly deserves a prolonged applause. 


To Download Movie..


Click Here..[Pdvd HQ Movie]